The first post is about the Big Bang Theory, galactic placement, and the planets; the second is about Molecular Biology and the final one will contain concluding thoughts.
As for evolution itself, there are
currently even scientists and paleontologists that are starting to believe that
it is an impossible thing to have occurred. In reference to that
statement, it was written “An increasing number of scientists, most particularly
a growing number of evolutionists (particularly academic philosophers) agree
that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theory at
all. Many of the critics have the highest credentials.” (Darwin’s
Theory: An Exercise in Science. Michael Ruse. New Scientist. Pg. 828-830.
June 25, 1981).
According to the Grant R. Jeffery, writer of The
Signature of God, he explained that Charles Darwin admitted that millions of
‘missing links’ would need to be revealed in the fossil record for an attempt
to accurately confirm his speculation that all species had progressively
evolved by chance mutation into new species. Although for his theory,
despite the millions that have been spent on probing for fossils globally for
more than a century, the scientists have failed to locate one missing link out
of the millions that must exist if evolution is to be proven truthful and more
than just a theory. Even the writer David Berlinsky was quoted to say,
“There are gaps in the fossil graveyard, places where there should be
intermediate forms, but where there is nothing whatsoever instead. No
paleontologist…denies that this is so. It is simply a fact.
Darwin’s theory and the fossil record are in conflict”, and also an article
from Time Magazine on Nov. 7, 1977 reported that, “Scientists concede that
their most valued theories are based on embarrassingly new fossil fragments and
that huge gaps exist in the fossil record.”
According to
Dr. Colin Patterson, senior Paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural
History, in 1981 in New York City said,
One
morning I woke up and…it struck me that I had been working on this stuff for 20
years and there wasn’t a thing I knew about it. That’s quite a shock to
learn that one can be mislead for so long…I’ve tried putting a simple question
to various people: ‘Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one
thing that is true? (p. 1430)
And after posing this question to the
geology staff of the Field Museum of Natural History, all he got was silence as
a response, and yet again when he posed the question, this time in front of the
members of the prestigious Evolutionary Morphology seminar in the University of
Chicago, he received silence again until one of the members spoke up and said,
“I do know one thing – it ought not be taught in high school.”
When it comes
to speaking, how did language come to be in humans and how does it differ from
that of how animals communicate? Charles Darwin, Noam Chomsky, and
Einstein have different points of view on the subject, each with an interesting
take. According to Einstein and his academic acquaintance, Charles
Peirce, both agreed that man’s distinct capability to commune originated from
within, unlike Charles Darwin, who in his book The Descent of Man, wrote
“I cannot doubt that language owes its origin to the imitation of animals and
man’s own instinctive cries,” meaning that he believed gradualism fashioned the
species and the sounds they made that in time followed the evolutionary pathway
and turned into language. Noam Chomsky, an MIT professor and
evolutionist, disagreed and said, “The ability to speak with symbolic words is
an all or nothing affair and humans are equipped with a unique deep structure
that allows them to produce the discourses that we routinely do.”
Kenneth Poppe
also had a take on the subject of how language came to be. He went on to
write how humans differ from animals in how we are born with a inherent gift to
make a singular set of gestures and sounds that are understood by any other of
our own species in one way or another. In addition, he stated that we all
have the genetic talent to also process and assess information, despite how we
communicate the point and are trained in multiple different ways to send a
response, while in contrast, all other animal species on Earth have one way for
communication that is dependent upon that one way of communication. And
since animals only have one way to communicate with their own species and
humans are able to do it in a variety of ways with their own species, we can
use that knowledge to conclude that we have a unique form of the deep structure
that Chomsky talked about. Therefore it has to be registered in a
different way in the DNA of humans and animals respectively. Or in other
words, we can see that our genetics have an amplified ability that is
exceedingly intricate. This shows us that there is a critical distinction
between the progression of humans and animals that does in fact separate us
from the ancestors of chimpanzees and apes that Darwinists continue to say we
evolved from. As Poppe said, Einstein realized that
this capability, communication through sounds as well as printed letters and
numbers, could never be a product of natural evolution, which in his mind left
only one alternative – the God that he often referred to” and also that,
“Either Darwin was correct in that the human language developed slowly over
time from animal sounds or Einstein, Peirce, and Chomsky were correct through
saying that there are no parallels to the natural world in how we communicate.
(p. 168)
If we evolved
like it is taught we did, why is it that animals do not seem to have the
conscience choice of doing or not doing something? Animals are only able
to go by instinct when they, like in the case of birds, sing because that’s
what they are inwardly programmed to do, but with humans, we have the ability
to choose to sing or not sing. Is it by chance that animals go by
instinct alone and humans are able to make a conscious choice? What about
values and morals? Jacques Monod, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in
1965, was quoted to say, “Science is ignorant of values,” but Kenneth Poppe
believes that I say a variety of good and evil acts exist, and had
their origin from the concept of choice given to the world’s first couple made
in the image of God. This option to decide is what we all would have
requested, and choice is the dividing factor that puts humans on a spiritual
plane totally separating us from either bacterium or chimps, which remain on
the biological plane only. (p. 188-189)
Also,
if you compare the Nobel Eightfold Path of Buddhism, the 42 Declarations of
Purity of the Egyptian Ma’ at Law, the Chivalric Order of the medieval knights,
and the 10 Commandments, amongst many other writings in the cultures of the
world, there is a remarkable point of occurrence in the values, morals, and
rules that are the basis of how we should live or treat others. In which
these lead to the reality of a force in the world that causes people to need to
have certain rules to govern how they live, and this also shows the existence
of good and evil extends to a further power that is greater than the ideals
that evolution has a difficult time clearing up. Societies in general,
along with common sense, also can show us that there is truth to saying that
values exist and their existence proves that there is a Giver of those values;
they aren’t something that came along by chance.
References
1) Poppe, Kenneth. 2008. Exposing
Darwinism’s Weakest Link: Why Evolution Cannot Explain Human existence. Eugene, Oregon. Harvest House Publishers.
2) Comfort, Ray. Feb. 2003. The Evidence Bible. Bridge Logos Pub. New and Revised Edition.
3) Battersby, Stephen. Mysterious Radio Waves Emitted from Nearby Galaxy. Retrieved from: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18775-mysterious-radio-waves-emitted-from-nearby-galaxy.html
4) OceanMotion and surface currents.
Retrived from: http://oceanmotion.org/html/background/timeline1800.htm
5) Michael Ruse.
Darwin’s Theory: An Exercise in
Science. Retrived from: http://bit.ly/1bQe7i6
6) Feb. 15, 2004. A Question of Origins dvd. USA: Eternal
Productions Studios. Jim Tetlow.
No comments:
Post a Comment